Stolen Summer

Lost summer

When she was 11 years old my daughter Natalie was an extra in a movie.  A friend of ours landed her the roll of “church-goer” in a scene filmed at the Catholic parish just a mile from our home, when he served as assistant director for “Stolen Summer,” first winner of the Project Greenlight film competition launched by Ben Affleck and Matt Damon in 2000.  Parts of the movie were shot here in Deerfield, hometown to the contest winner, writer/director Pete Jones.

As you can imagine, she was thrilled, delighted with the glossy photo of the film’s co-star, Bonnie Hunt, who’d kindly scrawled next to her signature, “It was great working with you, Natalie!”

I ran into Pete Jones at Starbucks recently, and the title of his movie has been in my mind ever since.  As the summer of 2014 passed into fall, I had the sense that it, too, had been stolen, or perhaps more accurately, simply lost.

It’s been nine months since my son’s move to an adult family home, the transition we planned for and agonized over for years.  I realize now how much hope I’d pinned to this move, how dearly I wanted it to mark a turning point in Daniel’s life, to be the moment when the rest of his life, his real life, began.

For months I’ve been holding my breath, my own life on pause, waiting for the transformation to unfold.

I knew enough to give it time, to allow him to settle, to adjust to the life-change this move would entail.  And he did adjust; he adjusted rather beautifully, falling into the routines of the new household, agreeable if distant companionship with his housemates, and affectionate, nurturing bonds with his caregivers.

He adjusted better than I did, in fact, unburdened by expectations honed over a dozen fretful years.  Perhaps this is one gift autism grants the people it affects as profoundly as it does my son: Daniel doesn’t realize that in the eyes of the system he is now an adult.

It took me all summer to recognize that I’ve been watching his childhood recede, and with it, the mindset when autism still seemed malleable, and open to improvement; where options and potential still shimmered with expectant possibility.  His move to the adult system, so long anticipated, now carried a more threatening measure of permanence, the grim recognition that this may be as good as it gets.

I should have seen this coming.  Rationally, I knew his behaviors wouldn’t magically disappear once he turned 22 and moved to a new living situation.  His obsessions moved with him, stubborn, baffling, hampering every new opportunity I’d allowed myself to dream would emerge at this stage of his life.  The off-grounds day program we imagined providing structure, purpose and meaning to his days was put on indefinite hold at the end of August, after repeated, disruptive episodes of beverage stealing and aggression.  Staff now provide a “home-based” program, involving scheduled chores, neighborhood walks, visits to the animal shelter: modest pursuits within the safety zone, the scope of Daniel’s tolerance.

I knew this was possible, even likely.  I hoped anyway, and clung to the nebulous but cherished future I’ve been envisioning for my son for years.

All summer I waited for it to get better, even as I understood that whatever “better” means now is light years away from what “better” used to mean, once upon a time.  For months I’ve been laden by an inertia I don’t fully understand, except the vague fear that the best days of my son’s life are behind him, the sense of possibility I’ve clung to for years now gone.

I don’t know if this is true; my fear may be a purely defensive, reflexive response to disappointment, to a diagnosis I’ve been struggling to reconcile for 20 years.  I pray that his life will evolve in ways that I can’t begin to imagine now.  But with the stakes so high — the rest of my son’s life on the line — I can’t bring myself to let go and “trust in the process,” as we are told to do.  That kind of simplistic adage has never cut it for me, not where my children are concerned.

Yet I’m no longer Daniel’s caregiver; I haven’t been for nearly seven years.  Accepting that I could not care for him nearly broke me, left me stunned, powerless to degrees I’m still discovering.  The sorrow of letting him go, the dank, potent guilt of it, keeps me from “turning it over,” from trusting that his life will unfold as it is meant to, even when that faith is the only thing left to cling to.

Instead, I spent the fleeting summer of 2014 in a cocoon of rigid, frightened watchfulness, eyes fixed on a prize I already knew wouldn’t be won.

We dreaded the shift to adult living, the ominous milestone hanging over the head of each parent of a profoundly disabled child. It took three years to secure Daniel’s placement, and when we finally had it, I was buoyed by a surge of optimism that carried me right over the edge.  The new beginning we were hoping for proved merely more of the same, a change of environment scant armament against so powerful a foe as autism.

My disillusionment crippled me all summer.  I accomplished almost nothing, focusing my impotent attention on Daniel’s progress down the same, narrow path he’s been traveling for years.  I must have been aiming higher than I realized, back in January, when he took to his new home with ease, laughing and smiling by the end of that long day when he arrived, officially, at adulthood.  It seemed like such a good omen at the time.  I feel betrayed by my reckless optimism in the face of his troubled history, by the exuberance that let me forget, just briefly, that autism is lifelong.

This summer wasn’t stolen.  It was simply lost to me.

I can let go of that now, though, and write about it, even while wrestling, still, to understand my reactions.  The journey of acceptance is lifelong, too.  I’ll be traveling this path for the rest of my life, my real life, as well.

There are summers yet to come, in my lifetime and in Daniel’s, opportunities still for discovery, for steps that may lead, one day, beyond the path he is traveling now.

This summer is gone, but Daniel is still with me.

He will always be with me.

Totally Unacceptable

nope-e1331250168742-1024x587

A few weeks back my son had a follow-up appointment with the new psychiatrist he visited in May to consider medication changes that may help curb his erratic behavior.

I participated by phone this time, unable to attend the appointment near my son’s residence in Wisconsin.  I was anxious to hear the doctor’s opinion on the slight improvement Daniel’s shown in the bolting, aggression and beverage-stealing that so dramatically impact his life right now.

His group home director was a few minutes late in calling to patch me into the appointment, and I was beginning to worry that I had the time wrong when the phone rang in my hand.

“We had a little disturbance,” Steve informed me, his usual cool slightly ruffled.  “But all is fine now.”  Apparently, Daniel had demonstrated first-hand one of the behaviors we are trying to control, grabbing the McDonald’s coffee cup from atop the doctor’s desk the moment he entered his office.  It took a few minutes to restore order before Steve called me and the appointment got underway.

The doctor indicated cautious optimism that medication may help reduce Daniel’s impulsivity, and we agreed to wait another month to see how things progressed.

“I can’t guarantee anything, of course,” he went on, echoing the prognosis given by countless other doctors, therapists and behaviorists over the years.  “This may be a behavior he always exhibits.  We’ll just have to wait and see.”

What else is new? I wanted to ask, but instead thanked him, joking that at least he got to witness one of the very behaviors for which we were consulting him.  He didn’t reply, merely repeating that Steve should set up another appointment for six weeks hence.

I got the full scoop the next day.

“What really went down with the doctor’s coffee?” I asked Steve eagerly, reaching him by phone the following afternoon.

“Well, he wasn’t what you’d call pleased,” Steve replied.  Daniel had lunged straight for the doctor’s cup, wheeled around and began gulping, the coffee splashing across desk, chair and rug in the process.

Steve couldn’t help chuckling as he described the psychiatrist’s outrage that a patient under his care for stealing beverages had had the temerity to steal his own, despite Steve’s warning that the coffee, in full view on the desk, was at risk.

“These doctors need to see what it’s really like sometimes,” Steve opined, rather gleefully.  “It’s good for them to get a taste of the problems they’re treating.”

“Oh, man!  What did the doctor say?” I asked, my mortification at Daniel’s poor behavior vying shamefully with relief that I wasn’t present for the fall-out.

“Well, he jumped up, and sort of yelled, ‘This is totally unacceptable!  This is totally unacceptable!’”  Steve described how he’d immediately intervened, retrieving the cup, now empty, while his aide went in search of paper towels to wipe up the spills, which, mercifully, had avoided the doctor’s open laptop.

“I mean, I warned him,” Steve continued.  “He knew the drink obsession is one of Dan’s main issues, so it shouldn’t have come as a great surprise.”

“Oh, for God’s sake,” I replied, my initial embarrassment on Daniel’s behalf turning swiftly to anger.  “‘Totally unacceptable’?  Does he think we’re brining Daniel for treatment just for kicks?  That’s like a pediatrician being pissed when a kid cries while getting a vaccination.  What an idiot!”

Steve agreed, while acknowledging that he’s had good results with this doctor in the past, that his “desk-side” manner didn’t necessarily match his competence as a psychiatrist.

“Doesn’t bother me a bit,” Steve went on.  “It doesn’t hurt for him to come down from his ivory tower now and then and see what his patients are really dealing with.”

But it bothered me a bit.  Quite a bit, actually.  I couldn’t get the doctor’s choice of words out of my head.

“Totally unacceptable.”

Oh, really?  You’re coming a little late to the party, doc.

Because I know from “totally unacceptable.”

“Totally unacceptable” is the dismal care my state provides its most vulnerable citizens, making it necessary for my son to live an hour and a half away from the people who love him.

“Totally unacceptable” is that Daniel’s autism is so pervasive he needs 24-hour care, his every action monitored and guided by caregivers.

“Totally unacceptable” is his struggle just to make his needs known, his frustration at our inability to understand him compounded daily for 22 years.

“Totally unacceptable” is his not being able to hang with his father’s 10-year-old twins, coaching his little bother’s baseball team, or rooting for his sister’s cheerleading squad; “totally unacceptable” is his absence when his big sister received her Master’s degree in June.

“Totally unacceptable” is his zero chance of getting married, raising children or finding fulfillment in a career of his choosing, living in a restricted, sheltered environment rather than pursuing life independently, making his own decisions, earning his own victories and learning to heal his heartbreaks.

“Totally unacceptable” is that my son’s quality of life is dictated by a disorder bestowed through no fault of his own, that his greatest joy these days is being allowed to select his own soda from a gas station mini mart when I visit him on the weekend.

“Totally unacceptable” is the fact that despite my profound love for him, I cannot make him well, cannot erase the effects of autism which have cost him in every way imaginable.

“Totally unacceptable” is that my young, handsome, loving son needs a psychiatrist at all, that this disorder will make him forever dependent on others, including doctors whose years of schooling don’t mean they have a clue about the reality of their patients’ lives.

So are we clear, doctor?  I’ve got the “totally unacceptable” thing covered.

Well.

Okay, then.

The other day I was reading a quote to my husband, attributed to a nationally known motivational speaker.  I scoffed at his simplistic approach to “acceptance”:  “Change the changeable, accept the unchangeable, and remove yourself from the unacceptable.”

“Another fool,” I remarked scornfully.  “‘Remove yourself’?  There are some unacceptables that you can’t just remove yourself from.”

“Well,” my husband gently countered, “he probably means that that is what we have to strive for.  We have to try to let go, to not let those things keep hurting us.”

As occasionally happens, my husband was right.  Of course he was.  But I still have a ways to go in this regard.  Incidents like this doctor’s priggish reaction set me back even after years of struggle coming to terms with Daniel’s disability, to accept that which, to me, is unacceptable.

We’ll keep trying to find whatever may help Daniel control his behavior, and live his fullest life possible.  And I’ll keep trying to reconcile the disparity at war in my own head:  that while I find the circumstances of Daniel’s life unacceptable, I accept him unconditionally.  I can’t imagine my life without him.

Maybe I’ll participate by phone again, though, next time my son has an appointment with his psychiatrist.

Face to face, I might do something unacceptable.